Diskusia:Dejiny Česko-Slovenska

NPOV

Brontov komentár: „ak chces vydavat marxizmus leninizmus a komunisticke zvasty za "lavicovych" historikov, tak nie tu...“. No moment, to vylúčime názory „ľavicových“ historikov? Pokiaľ má takýto pohľad váhu, mal by mať v článku svoju zmienku, nie?--MichalT 20:56, 15. marec 2010 (UTC)

Prepána...to nebol názor ľavicových historikov, ale tvrdo komunistické žvásty z postalinistického obdobia. Odkedy píšeme články v duchu komunistickej ideológie?? Istý "redaktor" nám tu ostal trčať niekde pred 30 rokmi...ako sme si nakoniec mohli poniektorí všimnúť už dávnejšie, všakáno.Bronto 21:42, 15. marec 2010 (UTC)

Uff, zle som to pochopil. Zas som si poriadne neprečítal, čo druhý napísal... Moja hanba.--MichalT 21:47, 15. marec 2010 (UTC)

this map is WRONG and has to be changed! this map: https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BAbor:WWII_Southern_Central_Europe_1944-1945.png is completly wrong, it has no historical correctnes, although i dont speak czech or slovak, the data is clear. in 1944/45, there was no österreich! there was no austria. at that time the southern part of slovakia belonged to hungary, there was no czechoslovaki at that time! there was no czechia, but protektorat böhmen und mähren, sudetenland was part of the german empire. north-erdély belonged to hungary. and there was no yugoslavia. this need to be changed, because it is not scientific, wrong data and a lack of knowledge, obviously. and of course the borders of the ussr are wrong to. whether soviet troops de facto occupied allready some of the shown areas, is an other question, it has nothing to do with the legal borders, which have been determined later in international treaties, but even if we look on the occupied terretories, the borders would be wrong anyhow, because in this case, there is still no czechoslovakia, no yugoslavia and no austria and romania would look different too. so there is no way, how this map could be correct.